The Impact of Vlog-Mediated Speaking on University Students’ Speaking Skill

Authors

  • Mohammad Ikbal Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon
  • Misdi Misdi Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon
  • Apandi Apandi Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55583/jkip.v7i6.2738

Keywords:

vlog-mediated speaking, speaking skills, mixed-method approach, reflective responses, English language learning

Abstract

Speaking ability is a crucial component of English language learning as it allows students to express ideas and exchange information effectively. However, many EFL learners continue to face speaking difficulties due to limited vocabulary, pronunciation challenges, low confidence, and insufficient opportunities for oral practice. This study investigates the impact of vlog-mediated speaking activities on university students’ speaking skills and explores their learning experiences during vlog project implementation. A mixed-method approach with a quantitative-dominant design was employed involving 16 students from the English Education Study Program at Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati (UGJ). Quantitative data were collected from students’ speaking performances across four vlog activities through pre-test and post-test assessments, while qualitative data were obtained from students’ reflective responses. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired-sample t-tests, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. The findings showed a consistent improvement in students’ speaking performance, with mean scores increasing from 55.47 in Vlog 1 to 70.31 in Vlog 4. The paired-sample t-test revealed a significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores (t(15) = 5.69, p < .001), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.42). Qualitative analysis identified three themes: enhanced confidence, improved speaking skills, and positive learning experiences. These results suggest that vlog-mediated speaking activities effectively promote repeated practice, self-reflection, and active engagement in English speaking development.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education.

Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159

Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fulcher, G. (2015). Revisiting language assessment: Speaking assessment. Routledge.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44244

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.

Huang, H. (2021). Effects of collaborative vlog projects on EFL learners’ speaking performance and engagement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 845–867.

Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12328

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Prayudha, J. S. (2023). The use of small group vlog video project to increase EFL students confidence in English presentation. JAMI: Jurnal Ahli Muda Indonesia, 4(1), 45–46. https://doi.org/10.46510/jami.v4i1.127

Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.

Saed, H. A., Haider, A. S., Al-Salman, S., & Hussein, R. F. (2021). The use of video-based learning to improve EFL learners’ speaking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14329a

Stockwell, G. (2016). Mobile language learning. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 296–307). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657899

Stoller, F. L. (2002). Project work: A means to promote language and content. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 107–120). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190.016

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.

Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57–71.

Weganofa, R., & Khoiro, I. (2021). The effectiveness of video blog (VLOG) on students’ speaking skill. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Social Science and Humanities (ANCOSH 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210413.049

Xuyen, M., & Nguyen, T. H. (2021). Effects of task-based speaking activities on EFL learners’ oral performance. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i6.3906

Downloads

Published

2026-07-23

How to Cite

Ikbal, M., Misdi, M., & Apandi, A. (2026). The Impact of Vlog-Mediated Speaking on University Students’ Speaking Skill. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan (JKIP), 7(6), 3526-3535. https://doi.org/10.55583/jkip.v7i6.2738